Archive for April 2007

Frightening article on the Radical “Christian” Right

April 12, 2007

I attend a tiny, mainline church, the First Presbyterian Church of Baldwin Park. Ours is the anti-megachurch. Part of reformed thought is the belief that we are all responsible for ministry: “the priesthood of all believers” is what we lay claim to. That, and the idea that comes from Jesus that we are to love God and love our neighbors as ourselves–and that “neighbors” should be interpreted in the broadest sense.

While I don’t believe that every big box church is espousing in total what is expressed in the article below, I do believe that churches that have attendance in the thousands have way too much authority vested in the few–the pastors. And there are enough of the megachurches that DO say these things (whether through the pastor of the church or through their guest speakers) that they become scary… and dangerous.

Radical Christian Right Preaches Liberal Evil

By Chris Hedges, Truthdig | April 10, 2007

The radical Christian right has no religious legitimacy. It is a mass political movement. It shares with these movements an inability to cope with ambiguity, doubt and uncertainty. It embraces a world of miracles and signs and makes war on rational, reality-based thought. It dismisses those who do not bow down before its god — and the leaders who claim to speak for God — as heretics and traitors.

The Gilead Baptist Church, outside Detroit, is on a four-lane highway called South Telegraph Road. The drive down South Telegraph Road to the church, a warehouse-like structure surrounded by black asphalt parking lots, is a depressing gauntlet of boxy, cut-rate motels with names like Melody Lane and Best Value Inn.

The highway is flanked by a flat-roofed Walgreens, a Blockbuster, discount liquor stores, a Taco Bell, a McDonald’s, a Bob’s Big Boy, Sunoco and Citgo gas stations, a Ford dealership, Nails USA, The Dollar Palace, Pro Quick Lube and U-Haul.

The tawdry display of cheap consumer goods, emblazoned with neon, lines both sides of the road, a dirty brown strip in the middle. It is a sad reminder that something has gone terribly wrong with America, with its inhuman disregard for beauty and balance, its obsession with speed and utilitarianism, its crass commercialism and its oversized SUVs and trucks and greasy junk food. It is part of our numbing assault against community and connectedness.

Ten or fifteen minutes of negotiating the traffic down South Telegraph Road makes the bizarre attraction of the End Times — the obliteration of this world of alienation, noise and distortion — comprehensible. The manufacturing jobs in the Detroit auto plants nearby are largely gone, outsourced to nations with cheaper labor. The paint is flaking off the cramped two-story houses that lie in ugly grid patterns off the highway.

The plagues of alcoholism, divorce, drug abuse, poverty and domestic violence make the internal life here as depressing as the external one. And those gathering today in this church wait for the final, welcome relief of the purgative of violence, the vast, bloody cleansing that will lift them up into the heavens and leave the world they despise — the one that was devastated by corporatism — to be racked by plagues and flood and fire until it and all those whom they blame for the debacle of their lives are consumed and destroyed by God. It is a theology of despair. And for many, it can’t happen soon enough.

The guru of the End Times movement is a small, elderly, gnome-like man with dyed coal-black hair, a battery-powered earpiece and a pedantic, cold demeanor. He is Timothy LaHaye, a Southern Baptist minister and the co-author, along with Jerry Jenkins, of the “Left Behind” series of Christian apocalyptic thrillers that provide the graphic details of raw mayhem and cruelty that God will unleash on all nonbelievers when Christ returns and raptures Christians into heaven. The novels are the best-selling books in America, with over 62 million in print. They have been made into movies, as well as a graphic video game in which teenagers can blow away nonbelievers and the army of the Antichrist on the streets of New York City.

The global nightmare that leads to the end of history is a visceral and disturbing expression of what believers feel about themselves and our world. The horror of apocalyptic violence — the final aesthetic of the movement — at once terrifies and thrills followers. It feeds dark fantasies of revenge and empowerment.

This theology of despair is empowered by widespread poverty, violent crime, incurable diseases, global warming, war in the Middle East and the threat of nuclear calamity. All these events presage the longed-for obliteration of the Earth and the glorious moment of Christ’s return. But until then believers are told they must battle Satan. And Satan comes in many guises. In churches across the United States believers are being girded for a holy war, one as self-destructive as that preached by radical Islam.

“We are at war with the religion of Islam,” Gary Frazier, another popular leader, tells the crowd in the church outside Detroit, “and it is not a handful of radical Islamists who are taking over the religion and hijacking it. The fact is, ladies and gentlemen, today if you read the Koran, and any person who reads their Koran, the holy book of the Muslims, and believes what the book says, over a hundred times it calls for the putting to death of any person that does not embrace the teachings of Mohammed.

“Can you explain to me how in the West that we would understand a person who would strap dynamite upon themselves and blow themselves up along with innocent men and women and children with the promise that they would have 70 brown-haired, I mean blond-haired, blue-eyed virgins for their unlimited sexual pleasure in this place called Paradise? And the parents of that person then throw a party celebrating the destruction of their child. You want to tell me you understand that kind of mentality? Because I don’t believe that. There’s no one in the Western world that can comprehend that kind of mind-set, but, ladies and gentlemen, that is the mind-set of the religion of Islam around the world.

“Islam,” Frazier says dramatically, “is a satanic religion.”

He warns of Muslim “sleeper cells” in America waiting to carry out new terrorist attacks.

“You may have a Muslim doctor, and he may be a wonderful person,” he says. “He may love his family, but you know what’ll happen? One day, they will come to him — I’m just using this as an illustration — they will come to him and they’ll say, ‘We have a mission for you, and you will either do as you’re told,’ [or,] and they’ll whip out the pictures, ‘Here are your three children. We’ll send their heads to you in a box.’ Now, the difference is, is that if somebody told you that, you’d call the FBI or Homeland Security or somebody like that. They’re not going to do that. Do you know why? Because they know the Muslim will do just what they say, and when it comes right down to where the rubber meets the road, boys and girls, they’re going to save the lives of their own children before they’ll save your own. And you most likely would probably do the same thing yourselves.”

He pauses and slowly scans the crowd, which sits silently, expectantly awaiting his next sentence.

“I thank God for our men and women who are fighting over there because if they weren’t fighting there, we’d be fighting right here in the streets of America. I’m convinced of that,” he says, and the sanctuary erupts in loud applause.

America, the crowd is told, is being ruled by evil, clandestine organizations that hide behind the veneer of liberal, democratic groups. These clandestine forces seek to destroy Christians. They spread their demonic, secular humanist ideology through front groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union, People for the American Way, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the National Organization for Women, Planned Parenthood, the Trilateral Commission and “the major TV networks, high-profile newspapers and newsmagazines,” the U.S. State Department, major foundations (Rockefeller, Carnegie, Ford), the United Nations, “the left wing of the Democratic Party” and Harvard, Yale “and 2,000 other colleges and universities.” All of these groups have joined forces, LaHaye has warned, to “turn America into an amoral, humanist country, ripe for merger into a one-world socialist state.”

The radical Christian right has no religious legitimacy. It is a mass political movement. It is interchangeable, in many ways, with other traditional political movements ranging from fascism to communism to the ethnic nationalist parties in the former Yugoslavia. It shares with these movements an inability to cope with ambiguity, doubt and uncertainty. It also embraces a world of miracles and signs and makes war on rational, reality-based thought. It condemns self-criticism and debate as apostasy. It places a premium on action. It dismisses those who do not bow down before its god — and the leaders who claim to speak for God — as heretics and traitors.

This movement shares with corporatists, who are busy cannibalizing our society for profit, the belief that there are a chosen few who know the truth and therefore have the right to impose it. The citizen, the individual, no longer has any legitimacy in this new world. All legitimacy is assumed by groups, whether they are corporate groups herding us over the cliff of globalization or religious groups that give popular vent to corporate-generated despair through faith in the Christian utopia. In this paradigm — corporate and religious — we become disempowered, afraid, passive and easily manipulated.

Apocalyptic visions like this one have, throughout history, cowed populations and inspired genocidal killers. They have enticed societies into collective suicide. These visions nourished the butchers who led the Inquisition, the Crusades and the conquistadors who swept through the Americas converting and then exterminating the native population.

These visions sustained the SS guards at Auschwitz, the Stalinists who consigned tens of thousands of Ukrainian families to starvation and death, the torturers in the clandestine prisons in Argentina during the Dirty War and the Serbian thugs with heavy machine guns and wraparound sunglasses who stood over the bodies of those they had slain in the smoking ruins of Bosnian villages.

Those who promise to purify the world through violence, to relieve the anxiety of moral pollution and despair, appeal to our noblest sentiments, our highest virtues, our capacity for self-sacrifice and our utopian visions of a cleansed world. It is this coupling of fantastic hope and profound despair, along with visions of peace and light and absolute terror, of selflessness and murder, which frees the consciences of those who call for and carry out the eradication of those they have banished from moral consideration.

When leaders of this movement, such as Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, sanction, as they do, pre-emptive nuclear strikes against our enemies, and therefore the enemies of God, they fuel the passions of terrorists in love with the same apocalyptic nightmares. They march us to our own doom cheered by the delusion that once the dogs of war, even nuclear war, are unleashed, hundreds of millions will die, but because Christians have been blessed and chosen by God they alone will arise in triumph from the ash heap.

In this new world, where those who seek to do us harm will soon have in their hands cruder versions of the apocalyptic weapons we possess, dirty bombs or chemical or biological agents, the vision of those among us who welcome catastrophic warfare, indeed seek to hasten it, who fervently await the apocalypse and the end of time, who believe they will be lifted up into the sky by a returning Christ, forces us all to kneel before the god of death. The prayers these “Christians” near Detroit — and tens of millions across the nation — utter for deliverance and apocalyptic glory only hasten our flight from reality and ensure our self-annihilation.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -

Chris Hedges, who graduated from seminary at Harvard Divinity School and was a foreign correspondent for nearly two decades for The New York Times, is the author of “American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America.”

© 2007 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/50366/

Why Marriage Matters

April 12, 2007

Three Days ’til Tax Day:
Second-class status equals a first-class headache at tax time.

Everyone knows what marriage is, but what are civil unions and domestic partnerships?

Civil unions and domestic partnerships have been created by some states to give some benefits of marriage to same-sex couples, while withholding the full equality of marriage itself. These new legal terms cause a lot of confusion during tax time.

Why create second-class citizenship and more confusion instead of just allowing couples into the system we already have—marriage?

Did you know…

· For filing taxes with civil unions and domestic partnerships, tax professionals are a near-requirement (and added expense) for couples to understand how to receive many of the protections intended by state law.

· Since the federal government only recognizes marriage, same-sex couples who have civil unions or domestic partnerships still do not get any of the 1,138 federal protections, rights, and responsibilities that come with marriage.

Get Active! Get Engaged!

Now what should you do with this information? How can you help? When you are talking about filing taxes this week, talk about these inequalities. And keep talking…

Talk to your neighbors. Tell your own story. Educate yourself. Contact your elected representatives. Get to know your local and statewide political advocacy organizations. Contact the leaders of groups of which you are a member. Write a newspaper, magazine, TV station, radio station or other media outlet. Create a visibility event. Host or sponsor a house party. Host or sponsor a family picnic. Ask someone you know — or everyone you know — to get engaged in this movement. Talk to your religious leaders about how to engage your faith community.

Who can you call to get answers to your specific tax-related questions?

Individuals, couples and families seeking tax advice should contact a personal tax preparer, accountant, or attorney.

If you are a reporter or an attorney with questions about tax time and marriage equality, contact Lambda Legal.

For a full list of the protections denied same sex couples and their kids, see “Appendix B” of Evan Wolfson’s book, Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality & Gay People’s Right to Marry.

For more information on Why Marriage Matters at Tax Time, or any other time, log on to our website at www.freedomtomarry.org.

Impeach Bush; while we’re at it, impeach the whole administration!

April 11, 2007

Not too long ago I was having a conversation with a man who is close to my age, mid-fifties. He is a casual acquaintance–someone I see only two or three times a year. Our conversation turned to Bush and the war in Iraq.

As we talked, he told me that he had been drafted, and had served in Vietnam. He served one tour, rotated back to the US, and then volunteered to serve a second tour; after a short time serving his second tour, he was wounded and sent home– treated, and then discharged from the Army (while George W. Bush served–or didn’t serve–in the Texas National Guard.) He has been in a post traumatic stress group through the VA ever since then.

I don’t know exactly when he was in Vietnam, but the fall of Saigon took place at the end of April, 1975–thirty-two years ago. So this man has been dealing with what took place for a very short period of his life overall, and more than two-thirds of his life ago.

What about the people who are serving now in Iraq? Longer tours of duty, shorter rotations out, multiple tours back. Even though they are part of a volunteer military, once they are in, there is no “volunteer” to it.

It took years for the horror stories of most individuals to begin making their way to the surface after the end of the Vietnam war. Sure there were the few high profile stories–the My Lai massacre. But no one wanted to hear what the average soldier had to say. So they had to suck it up, keep it secret. I knew guys who had served, and who seemed like average people after they returned. But when you scratched the surface, these were men who were sleeping with knives, a length of pipe, a gun under their pillows. They woke up screaming and sweat- soaked. Some of them drove for hours to get to the VA to go to their meetings, so they could talk with a shrink… but mostly so that they could talk to one another, the only ones who could really understand.

And, from talking with my acquaintance not long ago, some of them are still making that drive.

So what does the future hold for those who are serving now in Iraq? One, two, three tours, some longer than a year. I went to Las Vegas a few weeks ago, and we stopped in Victorville for lunch. We weren’t far from Fort Irwin, the desert Army base where they have training for those headed for Iraq (because the terrain is so similar). The fast food place where we ate was filled with young faces, their bodies clothed in camouflage. What does the future hold for these young people? When they finally get out of the Army–IF they come home alive–will they be sleeping with guns under their pillows? Will they be “dealing with” their war-related issues all of their lives?

There is no reason for me to think otherwise.

Support our troops. Bring them home. Now.

[And if anyone from the Administration Department of Domestic Spying is paying any attention to the writings of an average American like me, I have one thing to say: Read it. And weep.]

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -

from washingtonpost.com

Gates Announces Longer Tours for Active-Duty Army Soldiers

By Josh White
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, April 11, 2007; 5:14 PM

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates announced this afternoon that all active-duty Army soldiers currently deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan could serve extended tours of up to 15 months in combat, meaning more than 100,000 troops now at war probably will be kept overseas three months longer than their expected one-year deployments.

The new Pentagon policy also means that tens of thousands of Army troops headed to Iraq and Afghanistan in coming months likely will serve tours 25 percent longer than the one-year tours the Army has had in place for the two conflicts over the past five years.

Gates said the change is necessary to prevent five Army brigades from deploying to combat before they complete a desired 12-month rest period at home and to give predictability to soldiers and their families.

Marine units are still expected to have seven-month deployments followed by six-month rest periods at home.

Longer tours also will not apply to four National Guard brigade combat teams that Defense Department officials have slated to deploy to Iraq later this year or early next year, as Gates said he wants to keep to an earlier policy that would allow reserve units to mobilize for one year followed by a five-year break.

Gates said the extended tours are “a difficult but necessary interim step” toward a policy that would allow the Army to have its troops in Iraq and Afghanistan for one-year tours and then have a year off at home. He said the longer deployments also will allow President Bush’s “surge” strategy in Baghdad to last a year in case such high force levels are needed in Iraq. “We are creating the capability to keep it in place,” Gates said, adding that the surge will last only as long as commanders believe it is effective and necessary, based on conditions in Iraq.

The announcement makes official what had been an ongoing military strategy of keeping force levels up in Iraq, as commanders had sought extensions for several brigades over the past year to maintain pressure on enemy forces, especially in Baghdad. Gates and Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a Pentagon news conference today that the broad-based extensions will provide a predictable and dependable deployment schedule for troops and their families.

The extended tours are also an indication of how much strain has been placed on the Army as a result of repeated deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan for wars that have lasted far longer than expected. Two Army brigades that have already been extended will not have to stay longer as a result of the new policy, Gates said.

“Our forces are stretched, there is no question about that,” Gates said. “What we’re trying to do here is provide some long-term predictability for the soldiers and their families about how long their deployments will be and how long they will be at home.”

Asked if the extended tours in combat zones will be more difficult for soldiers who had anticipated serving a year there, Pace said: “Of course it is.”

Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said Gates’s “new policy will be an additional burden to an already overstretched Army.”

“I think this will have a chilling effect on recruiting, retention, and readiness. We also must not underestimate the enormous negative impact this will have on Army families,” Skelton said.

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) said the extended tours will expose the volunteer Army to more danger.

“This Administration keeps asking our troops for more–do more without the right equipment, spend more time on deployment even as our generals say there is no military solution to the war in Iraq,” Kerry in a statement. ” . . . This is the latest sign that the Bush Administration continues to overextend our military to the breaking point.”

Staff writer Bill Brubaker contributed to this story.

Good for them: Seattle abhors sexual orientation discrimination

April 11, 2007

Seattle Proclaims April 11 as Equality Ride 2007 Day

City Abhors Discrimination, Prejudice and Oppression Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

Equality Riders in Seattle
After successful stops at three West coast Christian colleges, Equality Riders arrived in Seattle this week to visit two local schools that discriminate against LGBT students. Yesterday, Equality Riders teamed up with Equal Rights Washington, statewide advocacy organizations, and Q Center at the University of Washington, to address marriage equality with community members in Gasworks Park. Today the Equality Ride will engage with both Northwest University and Seattle Pacific University in a full day of programming, which includes discussion panels, classroom visits, presentations, communal meals and worship.

In honor of the Equality Riders’ visit to Seattle, the City Council has proclaimed Wednesday, April 11, 2007, to be “Equality Ride Day” in the City of Seattle.

A PROCLAMATION recognizing Equality Ride 2007 in Seattle

WHEREAS, the City of Seattle is a welcoming city to diversity, including those who identify as Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender;

WHEREAS, the City of Seattle abhors discrimination, prejudice and oppression based on sexual orientation and gender identity, among other protected classes under city, state and federal statutes;

WHEREAS, fifty young adults on two buses traveling across the nation are using nonviolent means to raise awareness about the discrimination, prejudice and oppression Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender people may face;

WHEREAS, the City of Seattle recognizes the historical significance of bus tours and their ability to create conversation about difficult issues and create reflection within a community;

WHEREAS, the West Coast bus tour of the Soulforce Equality Ride 2007 will share their message of inclusion and tolerance within the boundaries of the City of Seattle;

WHEREAS, some of our city’s most respected organizations and businesses, such as Multifaith Works, Equal Rights Washington and the Seattle Gay News are hosting the West Coast bus tour here in Seattle;

WHEREAS, Soulforce, the sponsor of Equality Ride 2007, is a non-profit social justice organization made up of many faith traditions, including those with no belief in a deity; NOW,

THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE THAT:

Wednesday, April 11, 2007 shall be “Equality Ride 2007 Day” in the City of Seattle.

Adopted by the City Council the 11th day of April, 2007, and signed by us in authentication of its adoption this 11th day of April, 2007.

Council President Nick Licata
Councilmember Tom Rasmussen, Sponsor
Councilmember Sally J. Clark, Sponsor
Councilmember Richard Conlin
Councilmember David J. Della
Councilmember Jan Drago
Councilmember Jean Godden
Councilmember Richard J. McIver
Councilmember Peter Steinbrueck

Marriage in California

April 11, 2007

Unfortunately, the Governor vetoed an almost-identical version of this bill (below) last year, and there is no indication that he will do otherwise this year. But it is important that the legislature keep passing this legislation and putting it in the Governor’s face and making him make the decision to turn us down. It is also important that there is such a broad base of support for the bill, and that polls show a continuing growth of support for marriage equality.

Thanks to Assemblyman Mark Leno, and to Equality California for their ongoing, hard work!

ASSEMBLY JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OVERWHELMINGLY PASSES BILL SUPPORTING MARRIAGE FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES

Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act, Authored by Assemblymember Leno and Sponsored by EQCA, Gives All Couples the Right to Marry

Sacramento - Members of the Assembly Judiciary Committee on Tuesday passed AB 43, legislation giving same-sex couples the choice to marry in California. Authored by Assemblymember Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, and sponsored by Equality California, the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection gives all couples the social support and legal protections that only marriage provides. The bill passed the committee with a 6-3 vote.

“Two people in a committed, trusting relationship deserve the honor and social support that comes with marriage,” said EQCA Executive Director Geoff Kors. “Denying someone the opportunity to marry the person he or she loves hurts couples and families that are dedicated to building their lives together. It is time to move forward as a state and let all loving and committed couples who want the responsibilities of marriage to get married.”

Lawmakers passed a nearly identical bill, AB 849, also authored by Assemblymember Leno, in 2005, becoming the first legislative body in the nation to approve a measure allowing same-sex couples to marry. Like its predecessor, AB 43 protects religious freedom by reaffirming that no religious institution would be required to solemnize marriages contrary to its fundamental beliefs.

“Our march toward marriage equality continues with another victory today,” said Assemblymember Leno. “We will not stop until all citizens are afforded their constitutional right to marry the person they love and raise their families with the respect, dignity and validation which are their birthright.”

California law allows same-sex couples to register as domestic partners, which gives them many state protections. However, domestic partnership remains a separate institution from marriage and shuts out same-sex couples from the universal recognition and consideration married couples enjoy. A separate system for same-sex couples leaves them without critical support systems that would benefit them in older age, upon illness or disability and in times of crisis.

Dr. Kate O’Hanlan, a practicing surgeon and health researcher from Portola Valley, presented peer-reviewed scientific literature and consensus statements from the nation’s top scientific and health organizations, including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Health experts and these organizations agree that excluding same-sex couples from marriage hurts LGBT people and their families because treating a certain group of people differently creates social isolation and victimization, alienates them from health, family and social support systems, and perpetuates inaccurate stereotypes.
 
“Medical science is unambiguous and unanimous in endorsing absolute equality for same-sex couples, including access to civil marriage,” Dr. O’Hanlan said. “The nation’s experts in child health, mental health, psychological health, women’s health and family health have reviewed the research and issued policy statements endorsing equal access to civil marriage because it would improve mental and physical health of America’s families, and harm no one.”

AB 43 is co-authored by 29 assemblymembers and 14 senators, including Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez and Speaker Pro Tem Don Perata. A diverse coalition of religious and civil rights organizations and leaders support the bill, including the California Conference of the NAACP, Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, United Farm Workers, Chinese for Affirmative Action, Asian Law Caucus, California Council of Churches/Church IMPACT, California NOW, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, American Civil Liberties Union, California Teachers Association, Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, Service Employees International Union, People for the American Way, National Black Justice Coalition, Gray Panthers, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights, Equal Rights Advocates and the California Nurses Association.

It’s time: Democrats need to be strong for LGBT rights

April 9, 2007

It’s irritating. The Democrats have taken the votes of gay men and lesbians for granted in general elections. And most of the time, the Democrat is a better choice than the Republican when it comes to LGBT issues. But it’s time to stop taking the crumbs, time for us to step up and say that we want FULL rights. Marriage–not some pseudo sort-of equivalent. Sure, hospital visitation and medical decision-making and death benefits are important; but let’s stop pretending that anything short of marriage is “everything but the name.” If you can’t get all of the automatically-conferred rights and benefits–including filing joint taxes and inheritance rights and social security benefits–then it isn’t equal. It’s separate and UNequal. And unfair.

It’s time for candidates to step up and tell us that they unequivocally believe in access to marriage for all couples so that we can support them whole-heartedly…

…or that they don’t–and then we can choose to accept the crumbs and second-class citizenship that they offer, or we can “take it to the streets” (and the polling booths) to tell them that their best just ain’t good enough.

see Laura Flanders: To Beat the Right, Clinton and Obama Need to Be Clear About Supporting Gay Rights

If it weren’t for Jesus…

April 6, 2007

If it weren’t for Jesus, there would be no hospitality in Christianity. There are churches that claim to be Christian all over the place with signs out front proclaiming their hospitality: “WELCOME!” they proclaim.

But what is welcoming? Jesus said, “Whenever you do it to the least of these, you do it unto me.” Right? Jesus was talking about the isolated, the left out, the rejects, the losers–those with no power and no resources.

Last night at the little Presbyterian church to which I belong, we had a Maundy Thursday service. Some of the elements of this service are footwashing–unique to this service, remembering Jesus’ servanthood of course, but also his hospitality–and communion. And the gospel message, ending with “I give you a new commandment: Love one another. And you’re to love one another the way I have loved you. This is how all will know that you’re my disciples: that you truly love one another.”

In the sermon, the pastor talked about attending a banquet where everyone was dysfunctional. Two of the guests were quibbling about having special seats; another was going to tell everyone that he never even met Jesus; and yet another was about to leave the party to go tell the authorities where they could find Jesus to capture, torture, illegally try, and finally execute him.

But what did Jesus do? First of all, he washed their feet! Then he fed them, ending the meal by giving them a final course far beyond any deserving: he gave them himself to be with them for all time through the bread and the wine, the body and the blood. Servanthood, humility, forgiveness, hospitality. All things that Jesus was trying all along to teach the disciples–things that they never seemed to “get” during their time with him.

And how is it that we “get it” ourselves two thousand years later? Pictures of the pope and the cardinals going out and finding homeless folks to wash their feet pop up in the newspapers. That’s a good thing.

But then… a story about a loving, married lesbian couple in Wyoming who have been denied communion. In the Roman Catholic church, this is a way of denying a person their full personhood. Making people into second-class citizens. Not good enough to go all the way.

Where did Jesus do this? At the feeding of the five thousand or the four thousand? No. There, he told the disciples to come up with food to feed all of the folks who had come out to listen to him. No litmus test. No secret handshakes or showing of membership cards. Just servanthood, hospitality, love. And even at this final meal that he shared with his intimate followers, where Jesus knew that he was going to be betrayed by Judas–and by Peter, the “rock” of the church–he still invited them all to the table, washed their feet, fed them, and loved them.

We 21st century sophisticates think that those disciples who hung out with Jesus were so silly and naive, and that we “get it” so much more than they did; but we can be just as silly and naive–and hurtful and unloving.

Jesus included people. The church (in this case, the Catholic church, but it is ALL of the Church) finds ways to exclude.

“I give you a new commandment: Love one another. And you’re to love one another the way I have loved you. This is how all will know that you’re my disciples: that you truly love one another.”

_____________________

Lesbian couple in Wyoming denied Communion
by Kathleen Miller
Associated Press
Friday Apr 6, 2007
Lynne Huskinson, left, and her spouse Leah Vader pose for a photo in June 2006.

Lynne Huskinson, left, and her spouse Leah Vader pose for a photo in June 2006. (Source:AP/Jennifer Ottinger)

Leah Vader and Lynne Huskinson, a lesbian couple who got married in Canada last August, sent a letter recently to their state legislator decrying a Wyoming bill that would deny recognition of same-sex marriages. The lawmaker read the letter on the floor of the Legislature.

Soon after, the local paper interviewed the couple on Ash Wednesday and ran a story and pictures of them with ash on their foreheads, a mark of their Roman Catholic faith.

It wasn’t long after that that the couple received a notice from their parish church telling them they have been barred from receiving Communion.

“If all this stuff hadn’t hit the newspaper, it wouldn’t have been any different than before – nobody would have known about it,” said the couple’s parish priest at St. Matthew’s, the Rev. Cliff Jacobson. “The sin is one thing. It’s a very different thing to go public with that sin.”

Catholics deemed sinners in the eyes of the church are sometimes taken aside and privately advised not to take Communion. But Cheyenne Bishop David Ricken, gay Catholic organizations and a national church spokeswoman said they could not recall any previous instance of a U.S. bishop denying the sacrament to a gay couple in writing.

Now Huskinson and Vader say they are struggling to reconcile their devotion to the church with their devotion to each other.

“You spend half your time defending your gayness to Catholics,” Vader said, “and the other half of your time defending your Catholicism to gays.”

The couple, who regularly attended Mass and took Communion, have not been back to St. Matthew’s since they received the letter a month and a half ago. Vader said they did not want to make a scene.

The 46-year-old newlyweds – Vader is a supervisor at a recycling center, Huskinson a coal miner – ran afoul of a sort of don’t-ask-don’t-tell policy on the church’s part.

“You spend half your time defending your gayness to Catholics,” Vader said, “and the other half of your time defending your Catholicism to gays.”

“I told my wife in good conscience that if I had known those ladies, and we’d have been having a beer, I’d have just told them to keep everything to themselves,” parish music director John Chick said. He added that once news like this hits the papers, “someone’s forced to deal with it now, aren’t they?”

The parish priest said that after the couple put their engagement and marriage announcements in the local paper, he ran reminders of the church’s teachings in the parish bulletin as a warning.

After the Ash Wednesday story, the priest sent this letter: “It is with a heavy heart, in obedience to the instruction of Bishop David Ricken, that I must inform you that, because of your union and your public advocacy of same-sex unions, that you are unable to receive Communion.”

The bishop said the couple’s sex life constitutes a grave sin, “and the fact that it became so public, that was their choice.”

Last fall, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops overwhelmingly approved new guidelines that say parishes should welcome gays while telling them to be celibate because the church considers their sexuality “disordered.” The bishops said that anyone who knowingly persists in sinful behavior, such as gay sex or using artificial contraception, should refrain from taking Communion.

Professor Carl Raschke, chairman of religious studies at the University of Denver, said of the Cheyenne bishop’s decision: “It’s no more surprising that the Catholic Church would deny Communion to an openly gay couple than a Muslim mosque would deny access to somebody who ate pork.”

Sister Mary Ann Walsh, spokeswoman for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said the church allows local bishops to handle decisions on who may take Communion, so there is no record of how many have been barred from receiving the sacrament.

Walsh said most cases she has heard of involved public figures. During the 2004 presidential campaign, the St. Louis archbishop Raymond Burke said he would deny Communion to John Kerry, a Catholic who supports abortion rights.

Vader said the couple never made any secret of their relationship. She pointed to statuettes of two kissing Dutch girls in front of their single-wide trailer home. She also said that the couple posed for a church directory family photo with Vader’s children from a previous marriage, and that the church has sent mail to both of them at the same address for years.

Huskinson questioned why Catholics having premarital sex and using birth control are not barred from receiving Communion, too. But the parish priest said the difference is this: The other Catholics are “not going around broadcasting, `Hey I’m having sex outside of marriage’ or `I’m using birth control.’”


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.